Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42075136›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2026

Application and Research Prospects of CRISPR/Cas Gene Editing Technology in Lactic Acid Bacteria.

Erhong Zhang, Jiao Yan, Jiahao Du, Xiao Chu, Dahua Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Erhong ZhangInstitute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Jiao YanInstitute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Jiahao DuInstitute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Xiao ChuInstitute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.
Dahua ChenInstitute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University, Kunming 650500, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are pivotal microorganisms in the food industry. Current approaches for functional gene validation and trait improvement in LAB primarily rely on traditional gene editing and homologous recombination techniques. These methods are often cumbersome, inefficient, and time-consuming, hindering the rapid and precise customization of strains. This limitation has, to some extent, constrained the rapid selection and industrial application of functional LAB strains. The engineering of LAB through gene editing technologies has significantly advanced both fundamental and applied research. Among these, CRISPR/Cas gene editing has successfully achieved precise modification of multiple genes in various LAB species. Compared to conventional methods, it offers superior editing efficiency and lower operational costs, opening new avenues for functional gene identification and genetic improvement in LAB. However, the application of exogenous CRISPR/Cas systems in LAB faces technical challenges such as high off-target rates, chromosomal abnormalities, and cytotoxicity. The development of endogenous CRISPR/Cas-based editing tools for LAB provides novel pathways for precise regulation, rational design, and flexible application. This paper first outlines the structural components and mechanistic principles of CRISPR/Cas gene editing tools. It then explores the research progress and applications of both endogenous and exogenous CRISPR/Cas systems in LAB. Finally, it provides an outlook on the future application of CRISPR/Cas gene editing technology in LAB, offering a reference for its implementation in this field. The advent of gene editing technologies has significantly propelled functional gene validation and trait improvement in lactic acid bacteria (LAB), thereby advancing both fundamental research and industrial applications. Notably, the CRISPR/Cas system has emerged as a transformative tool enabling precise genetic modification in diverse LAB species, offering marked improvements in editing efficiency and cost reduction relative to conventional approaches. CRISPR/Cas-based editing strategies in LAB are broadly classified into exogenous and endogenous systems. Exogenous systems operate independently of the host's native immune repertoire, conferring the advantages of broad strain applicability and high editing efficiency. These systems have been successfully deployed for functional gene characterization, metabolic pathway engineering, such as augmenting antimicrobial production, and probiotic safety enhancement via virulence gene deletion. Conversely, endogenous systems leverage the intrinsic CRISPR/Cas machinery of LAB, offering superior biocompatibility and minimized off-target risks. Notable applications include precise gene knockout and integration using the native Type I-E system in

Indexed as

CRISPR/Casgene editing technologygenetic engineeringlactic acid bacteria

Identifiers

PMID42075136
PMCPMC13119405

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.