ArticleNutrients2026
Feeding Recovery in Post-PICU Patients: A Case Series in an Intensive Feeding Program.
Article in Nutrients, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesSurvival after pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission has improved, yet many children experience post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-p), including persistent feeding difficulties that impair growth and quality of life. An intensive feeding program (IFP), also known as intensive interdisciplinary behavioral treatment (IIBT), reduces tube dependence and improves oral intake; however, outcomes in PICU survivors remain understudied. This study aimed to evaluate feeding outcomes in children with prior PICU admission who completed IIBT.
methodsThis study was a retrospective case series of children (0-18 years) admitted to the HDVCH, Corewell Health, Grand Rapids, Michigan, who subsequently completed IIBT (from 2007 to 2024). Variables included demographics, PICU course (admission indication, complications, length of stay, ventilation, and nutrition status) and IIBT outcomes (feeding modality, oral skills, and malnutrition status). Feeding outcomes were compared pre- and post-IIBT.
resultsSixteen patients were included (62.5% female; mean age 1.44 ± 1.21 years). Primary PICU admission causes were post-operative recovery (68.8%) and acute respiratory failure (25%). PICU complications included acute respiratory failure (43.8%) and the need for respiratory support beyond baseline (62.5%). At PICU discharge, 75% remained tube-fed and 18.8% were malnourished. The mean time from PICU discharge to IIBT initiation was 641 ± 385 days. At IIBT baseline, 75% were tube-fed and all were non-self-feeders. Following IIBT completion (mean length of stay 4.8 ± 0.9 weeks), 58% of tube-fed patients achieved tube removal eligibility; 44% transitioned to partial or full self-feeding; problematic mealtime behaviors decreased (45.7% → 9.9%); oral acceptance improved (62% → 95%); and mouth clearance improved (59% → 96%). Malnutrition prevalence decreased (20% → 12%).
conclusionsChildren with prior PICU admission demonstrated substantial feeding and behavioral improvement during IIBT participation, with over half achieving tube-weaning eligibility. The time from referral to program start reflects barriers that delay intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.