ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Liver Xenotransplantation: From Early Primate Trials to the First-in-Human Porcine Bridging Therapies.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Liver transplantation remains the definitive treatment for end-stage liver disease and acute liver failure, yet a critical and persistent shortage of donor organs results in thousands of preventable deaths annually worldwide. Xenotransplantation has emerged as a potential solution to this structural deficit. This narrative review traces the evolution of liver xenotransplantation, from early non-human primate trials in the 1960s through the application of CRISPR/Cas9-driven multi-gene editing platforms in contemporary porcine donors. The immunological barriers that drove the transition from primate to porcine donors are examined, including hyperacute rejection mediated by anti-α-Gal antibodies, coagulation dysregulation and xenograft thrombotic microangiopathy. The genetic engineering strategies underlying current triple-knockout, ten-gene-edited donor pigs are reviewed alongside the preclinical non-human primate evidence establishing biological feasibility. The three pig-to-human liver xenotransplantation studies published between 2025 and 2026 are then analyzed, encompassing heterotopic auxiliary transplantation in a brain-dead decedent, extracorporeal liver cross-circulation and the first auxiliary liver xenotransplantation in a living recipient with a documented 171-day survival. These cases collectively provide preliminary evidence supporting proof-of-concept for porcine hepatic bridging therapy, with current evidence supporting a role for xenogeneic liver support as a temporary bridge to recovery or allotransplantation rather than definitive organ replacement. Xenograft thrombotic microangiopathy is identified as the principal remaining biological barrier, and the substantial translational challenges, including reproducibility, scalability and regulatory readiness that must be resolved before broader clinical application can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.