ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026
Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A State-of-the-Art Review.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cardiac amyloidosis on survival in aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR: a systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Identifying implementation strategies to increase the early detection of cardiac amyloidosis: a pre-implementation study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains underrecognized due to overlapping features with other cardiovascular conditions, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease. Certain 'red flag' features across the clinical and imaging spectrum help identify CA. However, these features are often absent, subtle, or inconsistently recognized, particularly in early disease, and are atypical phenotypes. This leads to frequent delays in diagnosis and presentation at advanced stages. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising approach to detect subtle disease signatures by integrating multimodal and longitudinal data beyond human pattern recognition. AI-enhanced electrocardiography has emerged as a scalable screening tool, demonstrating high diagnostic performance and enabling earlier detection. In parallel, echocardiographic AI has evolved toward video-based analysis, improving standardization and reducing inter-reader variability. Similarly, AI applications in cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear scintigraphy allow for automated quantification and more reproducible assessment of amyloid burden. Beyond diagnosis, emerging models support disease phenotyping, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring. This review synthesizes current applications of AI across multimodal testing in the evaluation and diagnosis of CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.