Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42074838›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence in Cardiac Amyloidosis: A State-of-the-Art Review.

Syed Bukhari

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Syed BukhariDivision of Cardiology, School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains underrecognized due to overlapping features with other cardiovascular conditions, including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and hypertensive heart disease. Certain 'red flag' features across the clinical and imaging spectrum help identify CA. However, these features are often absent, subtle, or inconsistently recognized, particularly in early disease, and are atypical phenotypes. This leads to frequent delays in diagnosis and presentation at advanced stages. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers a promising approach to detect subtle disease signatures by integrating multimodal and longitudinal data beyond human pattern recognition. AI-enhanced electrocardiography has emerged as a scalable screening tool, demonstrating high diagnostic performance and enabling earlier detection. In parallel, echocardiographic AI has evolved toward video-based analysis, improving standardization and reducing inter-reader variability. Similarly, AI applications in cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear scintigraphy allow for automated quantification and more reproducible assessment of amyloid burden. Beyond diagnosis, emerging models support disease phenotyping, risk stratification, and treatment monitoring. This review synthesizes current applications of AI across multimodal testing in the evaluation and diagnosis of CA.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecardiac amyloidosiscardiac magnetic resonance imagingECGechocardiogramnuclear scintigraphy

Identifiers

PMID42074838
PMCPMC13116608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.