Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42074608›Full record

ArticleGenes2026

Genetic Diversity and Phylogenetic Relationships Among Accessions of

Cynthia O Anukege, Mark Schoenbeck, P Roxanne Kellar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cynthia O AnukegeDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-8874-0445
Mark SchoenbeckDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.
P Roxanne KellarDepartment of Biology, University of Nebraska at Omaha, Omaha, NE 68182, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8082-6328

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDifferentiating plant species is complex, complicated by morphological similarities that confound species' delineation. For hundreds of years, researchers have used herbarium specimens to study plant morphology, and over the last forty years, these samples have also served as material for molecular phylogenetic research. Taxonomists have alternately split and combined morphotypes of

resultsStriking morphological differences among the individuals of

conclusionsMorphological and genetic variation exist across individuals of

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyMicrosatellite Repeatschloroplastchloroplast capturehybridizationintrogressionISSRITSnuclearreticulate evolutionsystematics

Identifiers

PMID42074608
PMCPMC13115678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.