The Arctic Daisy,

Liesl Bower-Jernigan Litschewski, Neil O Anderson, Laura M Shannon

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Liesl Bower-Jernigan LitschewskiDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.

Neil O AndersonDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9794-0397

Laura M ShannonDepartment of Horticultural Science, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3935-4909

Funding

Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Project MIN21-100The Beatrice H. Anderson Flower Breeding Fund 11030-20089

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesAccurate ploidy determination is essential for understanding population structure and evolutionary history for breeding and domestication. The

methodsThe objective of this study was to assess ploidy levels in

resultsGenome sizes were from 5.27 to 20.69 pg (2C), corresponding to diploid through hexaploid. Triploids were the most frequent (64%) before, as well as after, applying the reference standard bias (10% correction). All ploidy levels were present in multiple geographic regions, with no clear spatial, taxonomic, or latitudinal segregation. The high incidence of triploids, most of which were self-compatible and highly fertile, may reflect genetic instability, underlying aneuploidy (which is common in several

conclusionsThis study shows the challenges of accurately determining ploidy levels in the

Indexed as

ChrysanthemumGenetic VariationPolyploidyAlaskaGenome, PlantGenome SizePloidiesaneuploidyChrysanthemum arcticum subsp. arcticumChrysanthemum arcticum subsp. polaréflow cytometryploidy variationpolyploidy

Identifiers

PMID42074562

DOI10.3390/genes17040444

PMCPMC13116836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.