ReviewGenes2026
A Mini Narrative Review on Human DNA Transfer Involving Dogs and Cats and Their Role in Forensic Investigation.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advanced Research in Forensic Genetics.Genes · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe potential role of domestic animals in DNA transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery (TPPR) warrants careful consideration in forensic contexts. This mini narrative review aims to provide an updated overview of human DNA transfer involving household dogs and cats as vectors, to clarify their forensic relevance, and to identify key considerations for the design of future experimental research.
methodsA narrative review was conducted using multiple electronic databases as search engines without restriction related to the timing of publication.
resultsExperimental evidence shows that dogs and cats readily acquire human DNA following even brief contact, acting as reservoirs for primary DNA transfer. Once acquired, human DNA can be redistributed via secondary transfer to a wide range of substrates, such as gloved hands, vehicle interiors, clothing, and surfaces. Moreover, multi-step and higher-order transfer events have been documented, highlighting the complexity of DNA transfer involving household animals.
conclusionsThe sampling on pets may be included in certain scenarios and may contribute to building a Bayesian network together with the experimental data. To deal with uncertainty during probability assignment, more experimental data, especially addressing the main variables impacting DNA TPPR involving pets, should be generated and are highly needed to assist in activity level evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.