ArticleGenes2026
Extensive Mitogenomic Remodeling Delineates the Family-Level Split in Velvet Worms.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVelvet worms (Onychophora) occupy a pivotal phylogenetic position for deciphering the evolution of Panarthropoda, yet their exact placement within this clade remains debated. Furthermore, early studies in some onychophoran species revealed extensive gene rearrangements and the truncation or even loss of canonical transfer RNAs (tRNAs), features uncommon in other panarthropods. However, due to sparse representation, the pervasiveness and evolutionary significance of these genomic peculiarities across the phylum remain poorly understood.
methodsWe sequenced and assembled three novel mitogenomes representing both extant onychophoran families (
resultsOnychophoran mitogenomes displayed high A+T content (mean 77.32%) but revealed a family-level divergence in GC skew. All genomes contained the standard 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs) and two ribosomal RNAs, yet tRNA counts varied significantly (ranging from 13 to 22), reflecting lineage-specific tRNA loss. Ancestral state reconstruction uncovered deep architectural divergence: Peripatopsidae retains the ancestral onychophoran gene arrangement, whereas Peripatidae exhibits a stable but derived gene order. Despite this architectural plasticity, synonymous codon usage patterns remained strictly conserved across the phylum, with all but one PCG evolving under strong purifying selection. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic reconstruction based on PCGs strongly supported Onychophora as the sister group to Arthropoda within Panarthropoda.
conclusionsOur findings provide robust molecular evidence supporting the Antennopoda hypothesis over the Tactopoda hypothesis for Panarthropoda phylogeny. Furthermore, we demonstrate extensive mitogenomic remodeling between the two extant onychophoran families, including divergent GC-skew patterns, tRNA contents, and gene arrangements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.