ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Evaluation of a National Breast Cancer Screening Program in a Middle-Income Country: The Case of Kazakhstan.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer in Kazakhstan, and a population-based breast cancer screening program was introduced in 2008, initially targeting women aged 50-60 years. It was subsequently expanded in 2018 to include women aged 40-70 years. This study evaluates the national BC screening program from its introduction in 2008 onward, focusing on program outputs, outcomes, and associated expenditures. Several administrative datasets and official sources were analyzed, including the legislative acts database, analytical reports on cancer screening programs, and cancer reporting forms. Trends in key indicators were summarized using the average annual percent change (AAPC). From the program's inception, the absolute number of women screened increased steadily, with an AAPC of 6.23%. In contrast, the proportion of eligible women covered by screening declined over time, particularly following the expansion of the target age groups in 2018. Stage I BC detected through screening accounted for only about 50% of all stage I BC cases diagnosed nationwide, while the contribution of screening to stage II cancers was below 30%. Neither the introduction nor the subsequent expansion of the BC screening program was associated with statistically significant immediate or trend changes in national BC incidence or mortality rates. These findings may inform evidence-based discussions on potential refinements to BC screening policy and practice in Kazakhstan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.