ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Occupational Stressors and Dual Health Burden: Associations Between Body Mass Index and Common Mental Disorders Among Hospital and Manufacturing Employees in Indonesia.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comparative cross-sectional study simultaneously investigated the dual health burden of body mass index (BMI) and common mental disorders (CMDs) driven by occupational stressors in two stepwise regression models. By classifying stress exposure into three clinically relevant tiers (low, moderate, and severe) in two distinctive populations-a hospital and a manufacturing company-we used the validated SDS-30 and SRQ-20 instruments. The robust multiple regression models uncovered a highly nuanced landscape of employee well-being that highlights the context-dependent nature of psychosocial hazards. The most compelling findings emerged from the interaction analyses, which demonstrated that the physical and mental consequences of severe stress do not impact the workforce uniformly. Regarding mental health, severe occupational stress proved to be a potent catalyst for CMD symptoms, but this psychological toll was significantly magnified within the hospital sector relative to the manufacturing environment. An opposite, yet equally context-dependent, pattern emerged regarding physical health. In the main-effects-adjusted model, the severity of occupational stressors did not demonstrate a statistically significant linear association with an overall increase in BMI. However, the interaction model revealed a hidden vulnerability: employees in operational field roles who report severe stress are highly susceptible to severe BMI increases compared with admin personnel. While administrative staff may face sedentary risks, field workers under severe stress likely endure higher physiological allostatic load, erratic shift patterns that disrupt circadian metabolic rhythms, and potentially poorer dietary coping mechanisms during active labor. This combination of physical exhaustion and severe psychological tension severely disrupts metabolic homeostasis, forcing the redistribution of adipose tissue and driving the observed BMI spike.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.