ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Perceived Individual and Systemic Impact of a Digital Wellbeing Package for Health and Care Workers Five Years Post-Release: A Qualitative Study.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study explores health and care workers' perceptions of the longer-term influence of a rapidly developed digital support package designed to promote psychological wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative design was used, involving semi-structured interviews with 20 health and care professionals, including frontline clinicians and senior leaders, who had used and disseminated a theory-informed digital wellbeing package, accessed globally by 82,425 users within its first year. Interviews conducted in 2025 examined participants' accounts of perceived effects at individual, professional, and organisational levels. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis informed by public mental health, organisational resilience, and implementation science perspectives. Four themes were identified: enhanced psychological wellbeing and coping; changes to professional practice and fatigue management; reframing resilience as a collective and organisational responsibility; and the sustainability and ongoing relevance of the resource beyond the pandemic. Participants described experiences such as reduced stress and anxiety, improved sleep and emotional regulation, sustained use of cognitive-behavioural strategies, and perceived improvements in functioning at work. Some participants also reported that the resource informed their thinking about leadership, psychological safety, and wellbeing practices, and described its continued relevance five years post-release. These qualitative findings illustrate how the digital wellbeing intervention was experienced by participants and how they interpreted its relevance over time. The study suggests that digitally delivered, theory-informed resources may have perceived value for individual capacity building, professional practice, and organisational approaches to resilience within health systems facing ongoing structural pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.