ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Urgent Admission and Inequities in Acute Hospital Stay in Canada.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Canada Health Act (CHA), enacted in 1984, guarantees universal access to medically necessary care, yet inequities in hospital use persist. Acute length of stay (ALOS) is a key indicator of hospital efficiency, patient recovery, and healthcare system performance, with prolonged stays linked to higher costs, avoidable infections, and strain on acute care capacity. Understanding patterns in ALOS is critical not only for hospital management but also for public health, as extended stays can limit timely access to care and exacerbate population-level health inequities.
objectiveThis study examines social, geographic, and clinical gradients in ALOS and investigates whether the effects of admission urgency vary by sex, neighbourhood income, and rural-urban residence within a universal healthcare system.
methodsUsing 2024-2025 hospital discharge data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information, this study examined ALOS as a function of comorbidity, sex, socioeconomic status, rural-urban residence (geography), and admission type (urgent versus elective). Interaction effects between admission urgency and key social and geographic variables were evaluated to assess subgroup differences in ALOS.
resultsDisparities in ALOS were evident. Older age, male sex, urgent admission, and greater comorbidity were associated with longer stays, whereas higher neighbourhood income and urban residence were linked to shorter stays. Interaction analyses revealed substantial heterogeneity: compared with elective rural admissions, urgent urban admissions had 30.4% longer ALOS. Urgent admissions also amplified socioeconomic and sex-based differences, with male patients experiencing 27.9% longer stays than females.
conclusionsFrom a public health perspective, these findings highlight how system capacity constraints and social inequities jointly shape hospital use. Reducing avoidable variation in ALOS will require policies that strengthen acute care surge capacity, improve coordination for urgent admissions, and address upstream socioeconomic and geographic barriers to care, thereby promoting more equitable and efficient hospital services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.