ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
Reintegrating the Human in Health: A Triadic Blueprint for Whole-Person Care in the Age of AI.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Superintelligence: A Crucial Juncture in the Development of Healthcare Sciences and Public Health.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Modern healthcare remains structurally and conceptually fragmented, with profound clinical and policy implications. At its root lies an ontological fracture: the prevailing biomedical model reduces patients to discrete biological systems (organs, biomarkers, and symptoms) detached from the psychological, social, and ecological contexts in which health and illness are experienced. This is compounded by epistemological fragmentation, where medical knowledge is compartmentalized into increasingly narrow specialties, limiting holistic understanding. These philosophical divisions manifest in downstream operational, informational, financial, and policy dysfunctions duplicative testing, misaligned incentives, disconnected care pathways, and population health failures. To address these multilevel fractures, we propose a unified architecture grounded in three interlocking components. First, the Precision and Personalized Population Health (P3H) framework offers a principle-based realignment toward care that is integrated, personalized, proactive, and population wide. P3H addresses the conceptual shortcomings of fragmented care by focusing on the full human trajectory across time, systems, and determinants. Second, General Purpose Technologies including artificial intelligence, biosensors, mobile diagnostics, and multimodal data systems enable the operationalization of whole-person care at scale, especially in low-resource settings. Third, the AI-WHOLE policy framework (Alignment, Integration, Workflow, Holism, Outcomes, Learning, and Equity) provides governance principles to guide ethical, equitable, and context-specific implementation. We argue that this triadic blueprint is particularly critical for Global South nations, where the lack of legacy infrastructure offers an opportunity for leapfrogging toward integrated, intelligent systems of care. Early models illustrate how policy-aligned, technology-enabled care rooted in whole-person principles can yield improvements in continuity, cost-efficiency, and chronic disease outcomes. This manuscript offers a systems-level strategy to overcome fragmentation and reimagine healthcare delivery, not only by refining clinical tools, but by redefining what it means to care for the human being in full.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.