ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026
The Influence of Forest Landscape Spaces on Psychological and Visual Attention Responses: An Analysis Based on Different Seasons and Sexes.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigated seasonal and sex-based differences in psychological responses and area-of-interest (AOI)-based visual attention, as well as the associations between these variables, using images of the same forest-healing landscape captured in summer and autumn. A total of 40 adults (20 males and 20 females) participated in an eye-tracking experiment combined with psychological assessments, including the Perceived Restorativeness Scale (PRS-11) and semantic differential (SD) evaluations. Mixed-design ANOVA results indicated that perceived restorativeness remained stable across seasons, whereas emotional evaluations were significantly higher in autumn than in summer. Significant interaction effects between season and sex were observed in selected gaze metrics within the sky AOI, while the forest AOI showed a consistent main effect of sex across seasons. Spearman's correlation analysis revealed a strong positive association between autumn PRS and SD scores, suggesting that aesthetic appreciation contributes to restorative perception. In addition, a significant negative correlation between forest and pond AOIs in autumn indicated a seasonal redistribution of visual attention. These findings highlight the importance of component-level landscape analysis and demonstrate that seasonal variation and user characteristics jointly influence perceptual and attentional responses in forest-healing environments. The results provide empirical implications for evidence-based forest landscape design and seasonal management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.