Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42074350›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2026

Circumstances of Percutaneous Sharps Injuries in German Healthcare Workers-An Analysis of the Ten-Year Period from 2015 to 2024 Based on Accident Insurance Data.

Madeleine Dulon, Johanna Stranzinger, Dana Wendeler, Albert Nienhaus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Madeleine DulonBerufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6728-9441
Johanna StranzingerBerufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.
Dana WendelerBerufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.
Albert NienhausBerufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege, 22089 Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1881-7302

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the implementation of safety-engineered devices (SEDs) in Germany, percutaneous sharps injuries (PSIs) caused by medical devices remain a major occupational risk for healthcare workers. The aim of this study was to analyze the frequency of PSIs and the circumstances of SED-associated PSIs in hospitals, medical practices, and nursing homes. Routine data from a statutory accident insurance provider for 2015-2024 were used to analyze PSI trends (n = 481,575), and survey data from online questionnaires were used to analyze circumstances of PSIs (n = 791). Routine data showed a slight decline (6.1%) in PSIs over the past 10 years across all sectors. Hospitals and medical practices had the highest rates (30.2 and 21.6 PSIs per 1000 full-time equivalents, respectively). The devices most frequently involved were blood collection needles in hospitals and medical practices and insulin pens in nursing homes. Overall, 43.1% of PSIs were related to the improper disposal of used devices. Around 31.1% of PSIs were associated with SEDs. Around 33% of SED-related injuries occurred during disposal. High workload and distraction were the most frequently reported causes of injuries. Regular training should be provided to raise staff awareness of the proper handling and disposal of used devices.

Indexed as

Accidents, OccupationalHealth PersonnelNeedlestick InjuriesGermanyHumansInsurance, AccidentSurveys and Questionnaireshealth personnelneedlestick injuriesoccupational safetysafety-engineered devicesharps injuries

Identifiers

PMID42074350
PMCPMC13116990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.