ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Therapeutic Efficacy of Rapamycin in an Experimental Mouse Model of Corneal Alkali Burn.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Corneal alkali burn induces severe inflammation and tissue damage, leading to loss of corneal transparency and vision impairment. In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of rapamycin (RAPA) compared with cyclosporine A (CsA) in a mouse model of corneal alkali burn, focusing on nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB)-mediated inflammatory signaling and its impact on corneal wound healing and repair. Notably, RAPA robustly suppressed NF-κB activation, reduced infiltration of F4/80 macrophages and MPO neutrophils, and downregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. RAPA also markedly inhibited corneal neovascularization, as evidenced by decreased VEGF expression, reduced CD31 vessel formation, and suppression of Ang-2. RAPA substantially inhibited pathological fibrotic remodeling by reducing TGF-β1 expression, attenuating myofibroblast activation (α-SMA), decreasing collagen III deposition, and modulating matrix remodeling through suppression of MMP-9. Crucially, RAPA preserved epithelial barrier integrity by maintaining occludin expression, supported proper epithelial differentiation through sustained expression of CK12, and enhanced mucin layer stability by increasing MUC1 expression. It also restored tear production, reduced apoptotic cell death (TUNEL), and decreased dysregulated epithelial proliferation (Ki67). In conclusion, RAPA showed superior efficacy compared with CsA, primarily by enhancing corneal wound healing and facilitating structural and functional outcomes in the burned cornea. These findings underscore RAPA as a promising therapeutic candidate for ocular surface repair and vision restoration in extensive corneal injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.