ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Neurotoxicity Prediction of Compounds: Integrating Knowledge-Guided Graph Representations with Machine Learning Approaches.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurotoxicity from drugs and environmental pollutants poses serious risks to brain function, yet existing computational models mainly target general neurotoxicity and lack specialized tools for brain-specific assessment. This study aimed to develop and validate a high-performance, brain-focused neurotoxicity prediction framework to improve drug safety evaluation and toxicity screening. We systematically analyzed molecular features, clustering patterns, and target predictions of brain-toxic compounds. Multiple feature representations were compared, including traditional molecular fingerprints, knowledge-guided pre-trained graph Transformer (KPGT) embeddings, and transformer-based MolFormer embeddings, combined with machine learning classifiers. Model performance was evaluated using multiple metrics, and SHAP analysis was conducted to identify influential molecular substructures. Toxic molecules showed physicochemical properties favoring central nervous system (CNS) penetration, including lower molecular weight, lower LogP, fewer hydrogen bond donors/acceptors, fewer rotatable bonds, and lower polar surface area (PSA). The KPGT-MLP model achieved the best balanced performance, with an accuracy (ACC) of 0.8928 and an ROC-AUC of 0.9459, clearly outperforming traditional fingerprint-based models, MolFormer-based models, and general prediction tools such as DI-NeuroT and ADMETlab 3.0. Overall, this study establishes a robust framework for brain-specific neurotoxicity prediction, with the KPGT-MLP model demonstrating strong accuracy and robustness. The proposed approach provides an effective strategy for early neurotoxicity screening and risk assessment, offering valuable insights for safer drug design and advancing computational toxicology and drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.