Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42074167›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026

Foreign Body Response to Neuroimplantation: Machine Learning-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Astrogliosis.

Anastasiia A Melnikova, Anton A Egorchev, Alexander A Rosin, Leniz F Nurullin, Nikita S Lipachev, Daria S Vedischeva, Dmitry V Derzhavin, Stepan S Perepechenov, Ekaterina A Sukhodolova, Gleb V Shabernev and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Anastasiia A MelnikovaInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-7686-1075
Anton A EgorchevInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Alexander A RosinInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Leniz F NurullinKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, FRC Kazan Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Lobachevskogo 2/31, Kazan 420111, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-6383-0322
Nikita S LipachevInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5145-7532
Daria S VedischevaInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Dmitry V DerzhavinInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Stepan S PerepechenovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Karl Marx 74, Kazan 420015, Russia.ORCID 0009-0005-7637-2518
Ekaterina A SukhodolovaInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID 0009-0002-7841-5516
Gleb V ShabernevInstitute of Computational Mathematics and Information Technologies, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 35, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Angelina A TitovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Karl Marx 74, Kazan 420015, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-5608-7809
Ramziya G KiyamovaInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Karl Marx 74, Kazan 420015, Russia.
Andrey P KiyasovInstitute of Fundamental Medicine and Biology, Kazan Federal University, Karl Marx 74, Kazan 420015, Russia.
Dmitry E ChickrinInstitute of Artificial Intelligence, Robotics and Systems Engineering, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 18, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Albert V AganovInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.
Dmitry V SamigullinKazan Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, FRC Kazan Scientific Center, Russian Academy of Sciences, Lobachevskogo 2/31, Kazan 420111, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-6019-5514
Irina Yu PopovaInstitute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics, Russian Academy of Science, Institutskaya 3, Puschino 422290, Russia.
Mikhail PavelievInstitute of Physics, Kazan Federal University, Kremlyovskaya 16a, Kazan 420008, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-2905-2272

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 24-75-00123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimplants represent an emerging medical technology, offering new therapeutic approaches for severe neurological and psychiatric disorders. One of the key limitations to long-term neuroimplant performance is the foreign body response elicited by intracortical implantation. Among the contributing cell types, astrocytes play a central role in glial scar formation around the implant, which can compromise device functionality. Immunofluorescence of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) provides a well-established marker of astrogliosis (neuroinflammation), yet quantitative and reproducible assessment of astrocyte morphology remains challenging due to the complexity and variability of image analysis approaches. Here, we aimed to quantitatively assess implantation-induced astrogliosis and to determine how classifier training strategy influences segmentation outcomes and morphometric measurements. We present a machine learning-assisted pipeline based on the LabKit plugin in Fiji for segmentation and morphometric analysis of GFAP-positive astrocytes in peri-implant scar versus distant cortical regions. Using this approach, we demonstrate an increase in GFAP expression, cell area, and astrocytic process length as well as the redistribution of GFAP signal along astrocytic processes within scar regions. We show that different classifier training strategies produce systematically distinct segmentation outcomes, with rule-compliant annotation improving agreement with manually defined ground truth. These findings highlight the critical role of annotation strategy in shallow learning-based segmentation and provide a practical framework for improving reproducibility of astrocyte morphometry in studies of neuroinflammation and neuroimplant biocompatibility.

Indexed as

AstrocytesBrain-Computer InterfacesForeign-Body ReactionGliosisNeurosurgical ProceduresAnimalsGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinMachine LearningMiceGlial Fibrillary Acidic Proteinglial fibrillary astrocytic protein, mouseartificial intelligencebrain–computer interfacegliagliosisneuroinflammationrandom forest

Identifiers

PMID42074167
PMCPMC13115741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.