ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Foreign Body Response to Neuroimplantation: Machine Learning-Assisted Quantitative Analysis of Astrogliosis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Assisted SHG Morphometry Reveals Distinct Collagen Microarchitectures of Trabecular Bone and Fibrosis in Bone Marrow Biopsies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimplants represent an emerging medical technology, offering new therapeutic approaches for severe neurological and psychiatric disorders. One of the key limitations to long-term neuroimplant performance is the foreign body response elicited by intracortical implantation. Among the contributing cell types, astrocytes play a central role in glial scar formation around the implant, which can compromise device functionality. Immunofluorescence of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) provides a well-established marker of astrogliosis (neuroinflammation), yet quantitative and reproducible assessment of astrocyte morphology remains challenging due to the complexity and variability of image analysis approaches. Here, we aimed to quantitatively assess implantation-induced astrogliosis and to determine how classifier training strategy influences segmentation outcomes and morphometric measurements. We present a machine learning-assisted pipeline based on the LabKit plugin in Fiji for segmentation and morphometric analysis of GFAP-positive astrocytes in peri-implant scar versus distant cortical regions. Using this approach, we demonstrate an increase in GFAP expression, cell area, and astrocytic process length as well as the redistribution of GFAP signal along astrocytic processes within scar regions. We show that different classifier training strategies produce systematically distinct segmentation outcomes, with rule-compliant annotation improving agreement with manually defined ground truth. These findings highlight the critical role of annotation strategy in shallow learning-based segmentation and provide a practical framework for improving reproducibility of astrocyte morphometry in studies of neuroinflammation and neuroimplant biocompatibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.