ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Stability and Degradation of Perovskite Solar Cells in Space Environments: Mechanisms and Protocols.
Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Physics-Constrained Transfer-Matrix Optimization of Diffused Regions in BifacialNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have quickly achieved certified energy conversion efficiency reaching a certified record of 27.3% for single-junction cells, while having a low mass, thin-film form factor and high specific power, which are attractive for space energy systems. However, their long-term reliability in extraterrestrial environments is not adequately ensured by terrestrial qualification routes, and standardized space-related test protocols remain insufficiently developed. This review critically summarizes the current understanding of the degradation of PSCs under the influence of key environmental factors in space-ionizing and non-ionizing radiation, thermal vacuum exposure and thermal cycling, and ultraviolet radiation AM0, as well as atmospheric oxygen in low orbits. The central task of the work is to develop and justify the need to create specialized PSCs test protocols for space applications, since existing ground standards do not reflect the multifactorial nature and extreme orbital loads. It has been shown that thermal vacuum accelerates ion migration, interphase reactions, and degassing, while AM0 UV and atomic oxygen introduce additional photochemical and oxidative mechanisms of destruction; at the same time, stressors often act synergistically and are not detected by single-factor tests. Next, the limitations of the current IEC and ISOS are discussed and an approach to their expansion is formulated through the ISOS-T-Space and ISOS-LC-Space protocols, which integrate high vacuum, AM0 lighting, extended temperature ranges and controlled particle irradiation. It is concluded that the development and interlaboratory validation of such space-oriented protocols is a key condition for the correct qualification of PSCs and targeted optimization of materials and interfaces to meet the requirements of space energy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.