Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073972›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Psychometric Properties of the Italian Food Noise Questionnaire (FNQ) for the Assessment of Intrusive Food-Related Thoughts.

Edoardo Mocini, Olivia Di Vincenzo, Clarissa D'angelo, Carlo Baldari, Silvia Migliaccio, Andrea Zagaria

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Edoardo MociniDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4868-8102
Olivia Di VincenzoDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3152-3130
Clarissa D'angeloIndependent Researcher, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Carlo BaldariDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, eCampus University, 22060 Novedrate, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6227-3571
Silvia MigliaccioDepartment of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4563-6630
Andrea ZagariaDepartment of Systems Medicine, Tor Vergata University of Rome, 00133 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-7371

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food noise refers to persistent and intrusive thoughts about food that may interfere with daily functioning, emotional well-being, and eating behaviors. Although the construct has gained increasing attention in clinical and research contexts, no psychometrically sound tools are currently available in Italian to assess food noise. Therefore, the present study aimed to translate, adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Food Noise Questionnaire (FNQ). A total of 1087 participants (mean age 37.45 ± 10.35 years; 50.6% female) were enrolled in the investigation. Participants completed the Italian version of the FNQ, along with a convergent measure of food-related preoccupation and self-report measures of depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, and perceived stress. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a unidimensional factor structure for the FNQ, with salient standardized factor loadings (range = 0.803-0.919) and strong internal-consistency reliability (categorical ω = 0.917). Evidence of convergent validity was provided by strong associations with food-related preoccupation (

Indexed as

disordered eatingeating behaviorfood noisefood preoccupationintrusive thoughtsobesityperseverative thinkingpsychometric properties

Identifiers

PMID42073972
PMCPMC13113971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.