ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Reverse Distance Effect in Ordinal Processing of Repeated Item Sequences.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ordinal processing is a core component of numerical cognition, and its behavioral signature is the Reverse Distance Effect (RDE). However, previous studies indicate that the RDE is influenced by sequence composition, and it is unclear whether it is similarly affected by sequence types. Prior research has largely focused on non-repeating sequences (e.g., 1-2-3), while the processing of repeated item sequences (i.e., non-strict sequences; e.g., 1-2-2-3) remains unexplored. Experiment 1 (numbers) showed a significant RDE in the first and last repetition conditions. However, the middle repetition condition resulted in a null effect, suggesting that the middle repeated item interferes differentially with ordinal representation. In contrast, Experiment 2 (letters) showed a significant RDE regardless of repetition position. Overall, the RDE extends to repeated item sequences when interference is comparable between distance conditions. Moreover, the presence of the RDE in the letter task indicates that the effect observed in repeated item sequences extends to non-numerical materials. This study provides the first systematic investigation of repeated item sequences, highlighting the role of repeated items in order judgment and expanding the scope of ordinal processing research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.