Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073935›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Understanding and Cultivating Effective Listening: A Dialectical Theory of the Tensions Between Intuition and Behavior.

F K Tia Moin, Guy Itzchakov, Netta Weinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F K Tia MoinSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UR, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9638-7830
Guy ItzchakovDepartment of Human Services, University of Haifa, Haifa 3498838, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1516-6719
Netta WeinsteinSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6UR, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2200-6617

Funding

TWCF TWCF-2022-30555
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-quality listening is a multifaceted social behavior, and theories and research concerning listening and how to train people to listen are mixed in terms of listening definitions and recommendations. The current study canvassed lay practitioners' understanding of optimal listening qualities and training, drawing on a wide range of listening training materials (N = 207) sourced from the World Wide Web. Thematic analysis results were critically examined to systematically position praxis against our current understanding of listening theories. Findings are presented as a "dialectical listening theory," which posits that at its core, listeners' behaviors often exist in direct tension with their mindset or intuition. Furthermore, we posit that this tension is amplified when individuals are faced with conversations that conflict with their perspectives or values, making learning to listen challenging in practice. We conclude that high-quality listening requires direct recognition and strategic management of these tensions throughout the listening process and make recommendations based on listening and cognitive theories to inform best practice in listening training.

Indexed as

active listeningdual-processinglisteninglistening training

Identifiers

PMID42073935
PMCPMC13114012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.