Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073911›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

How Time Pressure Amplifies Framing Effects in Risky Decision-Making: The Role of Attentional Allocation and Information Presentation.

Zhun Gong, Haowen Wang, Xiaofei Ma, Yun Lv

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zhun GongDepartment of Psychology, School of Education Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266075, China.
Haowen WangDepartment of Psychology, School of Education Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266075, China.
Xiaofei MaDepartment of Psychology, School of Education Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266075, China.
Yun LvFaculty of Psychology, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China.

Funding

the Key Project of the Shandong Social Science Planning Project No. 23BSHJ02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decision-making under time pressure has been associated with reduced deliberation and increased sensitivity to contextual cues such as framing. This study investigates how time pressure reshapes information processing in risky decision-making and which types of information receive greater attention when cognitive resources are constrained. Two experiments examined the combined effects of time pressure, spatial position, and presentation order on framing effects, integrating behavioral risk-choice measures with gaze-based indices of attention allocation. The results show that time pressure significantly reduces fixation counts and fixation durations, suggesting more restricted information search. Moreover, time pressure enhances frame-consistent risk preferences, with contextual presentation factors further shaping decision outcomes. Specifically, under time pressure and loss framing, stronger risk seeking emerged when the certain option was presented second. Overall, these findings suggest that time pressure not only amplifies framing effects in risky decision-making but also is associated with changes in attentional allocation patterns and increased reliance on contextual cues underlying framed choices. This study highlights how the temporal and spatial characteristics of information presentation shape decision processes under temporal constraint and provides theoretical and practical implications for decision-making under pressure.

Indexed as

eye-trackingframing effectpresentation orderrisky decision-makingspatial positiontime pressure

Identifiers

PMID42073911
PMCPMC13113354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.