Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073907›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Watching Eyes at Home: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Sabine Windmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sabine WindmannThe ACT Lab, Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60323 Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3573-7526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Waste separation in private households remains difficult to promote, particularly in urban contexts, where anonymity limits informal social monitoring. This proof-of-concept study tested, for the first time, self-administration of images of "watching eyes" as an intervention. About 22% of all households living in the district of Riedberg in Frankfurt/Main, Germany, received a letter asking residents to attach eye cues to kitchen and outdoor waste bins to prompt appropriate separation of organic from residual waste. Objective data from weighed collection trucks showed a measurable behavioral effect compared to control conditions, with a 5-8% increase in biowaste volumes. While this study does not allow causal inference because waste was measured only at the group level, it does suggest that, when applied by residents themselves, social nudges might enhance self-awareness about environmentally conscious behavior. Accompanying survey responses displayed ceiling effects, presumably because only highly motivated individuals participated. Importantly, some signs of reactance were also observed, with some participants perceiving the intervention as intrusive and regulatory. Although low-cost and easy to apply, self-administration of watching-eyes cues requires careful communication and attention to psychological reactions to avoid resistance while encouraging the formation and maintenance of target habits in private environments.

Indexed as

habit buildinghousehold recyclingprosocialreputationself-awarenesswaste sortingwatching eyes

Identifiers

PMID42073907
PMCPMC13113408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.