Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073854›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Iambic Production Advantage and Unbiased Recognition in Word Learning by Mandarin-Speaking Children with Cochlear Implants.

Xinyuan Shi, Jingjing Yang, Dandan Liang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xinyuan ShiSchool of Chinese Language and Literature, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7031-3617
Jingjing YangSchool of Chinese Language and Literature, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.
Dandan LiangSchool of Chinese Language and Literature, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.ORCID 0009-0009-5643-1516

Funding

Jiangsu Education Department 2023SJYB0257National Social Science Fund of China 22AYY013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examines whether Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants (CIs) exhibit challenges or advantages in learning novel words with overt trochaic versus iambic patterns. Mandarin full-tone words lack salient stress cues, whereas neutral-tone words exhibit a clear trochaic pattern. Given the unique prosody of Mandarin and CI users' difficulty in acquiring the neutral tone, we predicted distinct effects of lexical stress on word production and recognition. Fifteen Mandarin-speaking preschoolers with CIs and 15 age-matched children with normal hearing (NH) learned 16 pairs of stress-contrasted novel words. A referent-naming task assessed stress production through pattern proportion, accuracy, and acoustic analysis, while a referent-matching task evaluated stress identification and word-referent mapping accuracy. In the naming task, children with CIs showed a preference for iambic words in both frequency and accuracy. They also produced longer second syllables in trochaic words than their NH peers. In the matching task, the CI group performed worse overall, although neither group showed a stress-specific effect. These results indicate that CI users struggle with syllable duration control in trochees. This difficulty reflects both an inability to shorten the unstressed syllable and the potential adoption of a final-syllable lengthening strategy linked to higher prosodic domains. The insensitivity to stress contrast in recognition may stem from the generally weak word-level stress cues in Mandarin.

Indexed as

cochlear implantsMandarin-speaking childrenstress patternword learning

Identifiers

PMID42073854
PMCPMC13113141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.