ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Evaluating the Effect of Glass and Carbon Fiber Mesh on 3D-Printed Concrete Performance.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Additive manufacturing of concrete offers reduced waste, faster construction, and design freedom, yet effective reinforcement integration remains a major challenge due to weak interlayer bonding and anisotropy. Most prior studies focus on vertical reinforcement, short fibers, or metallic systems, achieving modest flexural improvements (15-60%). This study evaluates horizontal continuous reinforcement using glass fiber mesh and two carbon fiber meshes (ARMO-mesh 200/200 and 500/500) integrated during 3D printing. The methods include extrusion-based printing of small (four-layer) and beam-like (eight-layer) specimens, both printed and cast, followed by three-point flexural and compression tests at 7 and 28 days under vertical and horizontal loading. The results show that ARMO-mesh 500/500 significantly enhances flexural strength-up to 100% over unreinforced controls (e.g., 24.4 kNm vs. 12.2 kNm in small specimens at 28 days) and ~60% over ARMO-mesh 200/200, while glass mesh provides only marginal gains (~12%). Carbon meshes also improve post-cracking toughness and apparent interlayer cohesion. A pronounced size effect reduces nominal strength in larger specimens. These findings demonstrate that wide-format porous carbon meshes offer a scalable, corrosion-resistant solution for load-bearing 3D-printed concrete elements, advancing automated digital construction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.