Comparative Studies of the Effectiveness of Rotational and Vibratory Machining.

Damian Bańkowski, Piotr Młynarczyk, Wojciech Depczyński

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Damian BańkowskiDepartment of Materials Science and Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, al. 1000-lecia P.P. 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2047-1515

Piotr MłynarczykDepartment of Materials Science and Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, al. 1000-lecia P.P. 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8831-7939

Wojciech DepczyńskiDepartment of Materials Science and Materials Technology, Faculty of Mechatronics and Mechanical Engineering, Kielce University of Technology, al. 1000-lecia P.P. 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5574-4937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Container machining plays a key role in the finishing of workpieces. The aim of this article was to compare the effectiveness of vibratory and high-speed rotational machining. Mass loss and selected changes in surface geometric structure parameters were assessed. To obtain a porous structure, the samples were prepared by sandblasting. The novelty of this work is the use of high rotational speeds for rotational machining and the use of a planned experiment to limit the number of samples. The innovative nature of the comparison of vibratory and high-speed rotational machining allowed the development of mathematical models of the influence of process parameters on the final results. A two-factor planned experiment with five levels of process variables was used to investigate a wide range of process input variables. Based on the RSM response surface, mathematical models of changes in mass losses MRR, arithmetic mean surface roughness Ra, maximum height of the highest elevation (peak) of the roughness profile Rp, and surface skewness Ssk as a function of input parameters were developed. Working containers with a volume of 25 dm

Indexed as

fine machininggeometric structure of the surfaceMRRplanned experimentrotational machiningvibratory machining

Identifiers

PMID42073720

DOI10.3390/ma19081554

PMCPMC13118132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.