ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Low-Velocity Oblique Impact Resistance of 3D-Printed Bouligand Laminates.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional homogeneous materials often face an inherent trade-off between strength and toughness, restricting their application in high-performance impact protection. Mechanical metamaterials overcome this fundamental limitation by integrating structure and material. The 3D-printed Bouligand laminates (3DPBLs), a type of mechanical metamaterial, are renowned for their exceptional impact resistance. While the 3DPBLs have been proven to provide superior resistance under normal impact, actual service conditions inevitably involve complex, multi-directional loading. We aimed to investigate the 3DPBLs' oblique impact resistance here. To this purpose, samples of 3DPBLs with varying helical angles (0°, 7°, 15°, 60°, 90°) were fabricated and subjected to low-velocity drop-weight impact tests at impact angles of 0°, 30°, 45°, and 60° to evaluate their damage evolution and energy dissipation. The experimental investigation exhibited distinct temporal evolutions of contact forces, with the 15° helical configuration identified as the optimal design. Further numerical analysis using a finite element model (validated with a deviation < 10%) is conducted to simulate performance under diverse impact angles in order to validate the reasonability of the experimental investigation. Mechanistically, 3DPBLs enhance impact resistance by increasing fracture tortuosity through their periodically rotated layered structure. These findings establish a theoretical foundation for developing high-performance, lightweight, and toughened protective materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.