ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Optimization of Parameters of Block-Shaped Support Tooth Structure Using Orthogonal Experimental Design in Laser Powder Bed Fusion.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To address the challenges associated with laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) of overhanging structures-namely warping deformation, powder adhesion, and inadequate forming accuracy-this study investigates the optimization of the support-part contact interface using Inconel 625 alloy. The objective is to achieve high-quality part formation with minimal support structures. A Taguchi experimental design was employed to systematically evaluate the effects of key block support parameters-tooth height, tooth top length, tooth base length, and tooth base spacing-on the forming performance of overhanging structures, with forming accuracy and support removability as the optimization targets. The results reveal that tooth top length significantly influences both the forming accuracy of overhanging specimens and the ease of support removal. Specifically, an increase in tooth top length leads to a rapid reduction in specimen deformation, but simultaneously increases the difficulty of support removal. When the tooth top length was set to 0.1 mm, all overhanging specimens failed to form successfully. Tooth base length also plays a critical role in support removability, with removal difficulty initially decreasing and then stabilizing as the tooth base length increases. Based on the trade-off between forming quality and support removability, the optimal parameter combination was identified as: tooth height of 0.4 mm, tooth top length of 0.7 mm, tooth base length of 1.0 mm, and tooth base spacing of 0.3 mm. A validation experiment conducted using this optimized configuration demonstrated good forming accuracy in the support contact area, with a deformation value of -0.208 mm, confirming the effectiveness and reliability of the proposed parameters. This study not only provides a theoretical foundation for the optimal design of block supports in LPBF but also offers experimental data and practical guidance for selecting support parameters in the fabrication of overhanging structures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.