ReviewCancers2026
Circulating Tumor DNA in Ovarian Cancer: Emerging Roles in Early Detection, Risk Stratification, and Disease Monitoring.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Liquid Biopsy for Minimal Residual Disease Assessment in Endometrial and Cervical Cancers: Molecular Rationale, Clinical Evidence, and Translational Barriers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of ovarian cancer remains one of the most important unmet needs in gynecologic oncology because survival is strongly stage-dependent and most patients still present with disseminated disease. Conventional non-invasive tools, particularly CA-125, transvaginal ultrasound, and composite triage algorithms, remain clinically useful but are limited by suboptimal sensitivity for stage I disease and by reduced specificity in premenopausal women and in benign inflammatory or endometriosis-associated conditions. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has therefore emerged as a candidate biomarker capable of extending liquid biopsy beyond conventional serology. In ovarian cancer, however, ctDNA implementation is constrained by low tumor shedding in early-stage disease, marked biologic heterogeneity across histotypes, clonal hematopoiesis-related background noise, and major pre-analytical and analytical sources of variability. This narrative review, informed by structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, examines the evolving evidence for ctDNA mutations, methylation-based assays, multi-omic platforms, and machine-learning models across three distinct clinical contexts: population screening, preoperative triage of adnexal masses, and post-treatment assessment of molecular residual disease. We also discuss positive predictive value, false-positive harms, health-economic implications, standardization initiatives, and ongoing prospective studies. Overall, current evidence suggests that the most plausible near-term role for liquid biopsy in ovarian cancer is not as a universal stand-alone screening test, but as an integrated component of risk stratification and disease-monitoring frameworks that combine molecular signals with clinicopathologic and imaging data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.