Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073584›Full record

ReviewCancers2026

Global Evolution of Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Lessons from Hong Kong's Innovation and Implementation.

Trevor M Yeung, Justin N F Lam, Rossetti H Y Lam, Simon S Ng

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Trevor M YeungDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3108-2649
Justin N F LamDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Rossetti H Y LamDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Simon S NgDivision of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5389-9297

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic colorectal surgery has revolutionized minimally invasive techniques worldwide, offering a more stable operative platform, superior 3D visualization, and wristed instrumentation for challenging pelvic dissections. This narrative review describes the global evolution of robotic colorectal surgery, from the use of multi-port to single-port systems, modular platforms and endoluminal robotic devices. Using Hong Kong's role as an innovation and research hub, this review demonstrates how integrated innovation, structured training, workflow efficiencies and digital policy frameworks can overcome barriers and inform international implementation of robotic colorectal surgery. Since 2005, The Chinese University of Hong Kong has been pioneering the use of robotic platforms in colorectal surgery, performing first-in-human trials of the da Vinci SP system, the locally developed Sentire C1000 and the EndoMaster EASE for robotic ESD. There is increasing evidence supporting the use of the robotic platform over laparoscopic colorectal surgery, with benefits including reduced open conversions, fewer intraoperative complications, shorter hospital stay, better long-term functional outcomes and improved oncologic outcomes. However, several challenges remain before robotics can be implemented widely on a global scale, such as higher initial capital costs, limited training access, surgeon credentialing and governance for AI-driven data analytics.

Indexed as

governanceinnovationrobotic colorectal surgerytraining

Identifiers

PMID42073584
PMCPMC13114844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.