ReviewCancers2026
Anti-Tumor Immunity in Solid-Organ Transplant Recipients.
Review in Cancers, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solid-organ transplant (SOT) recipients have an increased risk of malignancies and poor oncological prognosis compared to the general population. A central reason for both is that various factors unique to transplantation coalesce to dampen anti-tumor immunity. These include graft or immunosuppressive therapy-related T-cell dysfunction, microenvironmental changes in grafts due to ischemic/reperfusion injuries peri-transplant and comorbidities such as metabolic syndrome. Both innate and adaptive immunity are heavily implicated in cytotoxicity effected by systemic therapeutic agents, not just immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) but also conventional chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Hence, impaired anti-tumor immunity may also affect the treatment efficacy of these agents. Generally, clinical data for systemic therapies in transplant recipients is constrained to retrospective and heterogenous case reports and series only, with a low level of evidence and significant risk of bias. For ICIs, the efficacy in SOT recipients is relatively well preserved in cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas but seems diminished in other tumor types compared to non-transplant recipients. Data for other agents are limited, but the efficacies of chemotherapy in SOT recipients with colorectal cancer and sorafenib/lenvatinib in LT recipients with recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma seem preserved. Given the prevailing trend of broadening the use of transplantation in patients with cancer, further clinical and translational studies to develop strategies to enhance anti-tumor immunity while ensuring graft preservation are urgently needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.