ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Analysis of Interrater Reliability and Interpretive Discrepancies in Polysomnography Scoring Across Clinical Subgroups.
Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPolysomnography (PSG) is the gold standard for diagnosing sleep disorders. However, the subjectivity of manual scoring can lead to inter-scorer variability, undermining diagnostic accuracy and subsequent clinical decisions. This study aims to quantitatively assess scoring concordance among multiple scorers across various clinical subgroups to identify the factors that contribute to interpretive discrepancies.
methodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of overnight diagnostic PSG data from adult patients at a tertiary university hospital sleep center. Interrater reliability was evaluated by three independent expert scorers for 30 subjects selected through stratified random sampling. The polysomnographic data were independently and blindly scored according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine criteria, focusing on sleep stages, arousals, respiratory events, and leg movements, all scored in 30 s epochs. Interrater agreement was measured using Fleiss' κ, along with 95% confidence intervals, and included subgroup analyses by diagnostic category.
resultsThe analysis included a total of 28,291 epochs from 30 adults across normal, insomnia, obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) [mild-severe], and periodic limb movement (PLM) disorder subgroups. The overall interrater agreement for sleep staging among the three scorers was nearly perfect (Fleiss' κ = 0.932), with the highest concordance observed in stages W, N2, and R, and excellent agreement in stages N1 and N3. Respiratory events showed particularly high reliability, with near-perfect agreement for apnea (κ = 0.955) and substantial agreement for hypopnea, arousals, and PLMs. Pairwise analyses indicated the highest concordance between scorer 1 and scorer 3, while the agreement between scorer 1 and scorer 2 was lower, particularly for detecting arousals and limb movements. Subgroup analyses showed the highest and most stable agreement in moderate OSA, whereas severe OSA exhibited reduced reliability for sleep staging and arousal scoring, indicating increased scoring complexity with greater sleep fragmentation.
conclusionsAlthough expert PSG scoring demonstrates high overall reliability, significant variability persists in complex cases like severe OSA. These findings underscore the necessity for structured quality assurance and automated tools to improve diagnostic consistency in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.