Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073362›Full record

ArticleLife (Basel, Switzerland)2026

A Challenging Differential Diagnosis Between Brain Radionecrosis and Recurrent Metastatic Disease, with Temporary Clinical/Radiological Response to Bevacizumab and Later Imaging Suspicious for Oligoprogression.

Ana Maria Rata, Gabriela Rahnea-Nita, Roxana-Andreea Rahnea-Nita, Mihaela Emilia Dumitru, Alexandru Nechifor, Iulia Chiscop, Dan-Andrei Mitrea, Dorel Firescu, Raluca Barzu, Laura-Florentina Rebegea

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Life (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ana Maria RataThe Clinical Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Gabriela Rahnea-NitaSpecific Disciplines Department, The Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 020021 Bucharest, Romania.
Roxana-Andreea Rahnea-NitaM Hospital, 010903 Bucharest, Romania.
Mihaela Emilia DumitruRadiotherapy Department, "Sfantul Apostol Andrei" Emergency Hospital Galati, 800578 Galati, Romania.
Alexandru NechiforThe Clinical Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Iulia ChiscopThe Clinical Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Dan-Andrei MitreaNEUROAXIS, 040215 Bucharest, Romania.
Dorel FirescuThe Clinical Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.
Raluca BarzuLive Wins Association, 030923 Bucharest, Romania.
Laura-Florentina RebegeaThe Clinical Department, The Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, "Dunarea de Jos" University, 800008 Galati, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBrain radiation necrosis is a side effect of radiotherapy that can occur months, or even years, after the end of treatment. From an anatomical-pathological perspective, it is characterized by avascular damage, demyelination, and necrosis.

methodsWe present a case of a patient with breast cancer cT2N1M0 and multiple brain metastases occurring at 2 years after diagnosis, who was treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and Stereotactic Radiotherapy (SRT) for tumor progression. Dynamic imaging revealed right parietal post-therapeutic changes in aggravation, requiring differential diagnosis between tumor progression (TP) and brain radionecrosis (BRN).

resultsBrain radionecrosis and tumor progression are difficult to differentiate due to their similar radiological and clinical characteristics. MRI perfusion plays an important role in differentiating the two entities.

conclusionsDifferentiating radiation necrosis from a recurrent tumor is crucial for appropriate treatment. Medical management includes corticosteroids as first-line treatment, after which bevacizumab is administered as secondary therapy.

Indexed as

bevacizumabbrain radiation necrosislong-term survivalmagnetic resonance perfusiontumor progression

Identifiers

PMID42073362
PMCPMC13117898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.