ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Functional Properties and Mechanistic Study of Native Starches as Fat Replacers in Low-Fat Pork Sausages.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study systematically evaluated the potential of five native starches, including corn (CS), potato (PS), tapioca (TS), rice (RS), and sweet potato (SPS), as fat replacers in low-fat pork sausages. The obtained results showed that amylose content varied significantly, with PS and SPS having the highest levels (30.06% and 28.60%, respectively), which were beneficial for forming starch gels. Correspondingly, PS and SPS demonstrated the highest solubility and swelling power. In sausage applications, PS and SPS exhibited superior water-retention capacities, with drying losses of 6.75% and 7.03%, and cooking losses of 2.23% and 2.52%, which were lower than those of the normal control (NC) and low-fat control (LFC) groups. Moreover, the results of texture profile analysis revealed that PS and SPS enabled the sausages to achieve the highest levels of hardness and springiness, contributing to maintaining the moisture retention and toughness of the sausages. Electronic tongue and nose analyses indicated that incorporating these starches did not adversely affect the taste and odor profiles of the sausages, except for RS, which showed distinct flavor encapsulation properties. Overall, PS and SPS served as excellent fat replacers in the meat industry, offering healthier alternatives without compromising product quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.