Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073300›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Advances in Portable Biosensor-Based Test Kits for Pesticide Residue Screening in Agricultural Products: A Systematic Review.

Udomsap Jaitham, Wenting Li, Sumed Yadoung, Peerapong Jeeno, Xianfeng Cao, Ching Sian Zam, Surat Hongsibsong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Udomsap JaithamSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0006-2554-7127
Wenting LiSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0005-4430-6604
Sumed YadoungSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0000-5798-0132
Peerapong JeenoSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-8557
Xianfeng CaoSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0006-1944-6418
Ching Sian ZamSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0009-0001-8696-274X
Surat HongsibsongSchool of Health Sciences Research, Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5510-5905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pesticide residues in food and agricultural products continue to constitute a significant concern for food safety, particularly when rapid decision-making is required across production and supply chains. Although chromatographic methods such as GC-MS and LC-MS/MS remain essential for confirmatory analysis, their dependence on central laboratories limits their applicability for field screening. Consequently, portable biosensor-based detection platforms have attracted increasing attention as rapid screening tools. This review synthesizes 26 peer-reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2025 on portable biosensor-based screening tools for pesticide detection in food and agricultural matrices, including electrochemical sensors, immunoassays, aptamer-based systems, paper-based lateral flow devices, and smartphone-assisted platforms. Given the heterogeneity of analytes, sensing mechanisms, and study designs, a narrative synthesis approach was applied. Overall, the evidence suggests a shift from laboratory-centered detection toward field-deployable technologies that may support preliminary screening within food safety monitoring frameworks. Paper-based lateral flow assays are widely reported as deployable formats, while electrochemical and affinity-based platforms are often positioned as intermediate solutions for mobile or semi-controlled testing environments. However, most platforms remain at the proof-of-concept or early validation stage, and challenges related to matrix interference, long-term stability, reproducibility, standardization, and large-scale implementation persist. This review highlights the potential role of portable biosensor technologies as complementary tools within tiered food safety monitoring systems and outlines key priorities for further development before wider regulatory integration can be considered.

Indexed as

biosensorsfood safetynanomaterialspesticide residuesrapid screeningregulatory screening

Identifiers

PMID42073300
PMCPMC13115446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.