ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Food Safety Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices (KAP) of Urban Consumers in Low-Income and Lower-Middle-Income Countries (LLMICs): A Scoping Review.
Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food safety is a major global public health concern and a key contributor to the burden of foodborne diseases. This scoping review examined the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) related to food safety among urban consumers in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LLMICs). A systematic search was conducted across seven electronic databases: Medline (PubMed), Web of Science (Social Science Citation Index), Embase (Ovid), Global Health (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), Econlit (EBSCOhost), and Scopus to identify studies published in English between 2000 and 2025. Data extraction and quality appraisal were conducted independently by two reviewers, and findings were synthesized in a narrative analysis. Twenty-six studies from 14 LLMICs met the inclusion criteria. Of the 25 studies assessing knowledge and awareness, the majority reported that consumers had some understanding of food safety, although 10 (40%) highlighted limited awareness. Fifteen studies examined practices, with several noting appropriate behaviours; however, nine (56.2%) reported poor practices. Seven studies assessed attitudes, with most reflecting positive perceptions, while one (16.7%) identified negative views. Only four studies examined the full KAP triad. Across studies, factors such as age, education, gender, marital status, training, employment status, income, field of study, and residential status were found to influence food safety KAP. Overall, the evidence suggests that while consumers in urban LLMIC settings generally demonstrate some knowledge and positive attitudes towards food safety, there remain significant gaps in practices that could compromise public health. Future research should prioritise underrepresented regions, employ more rigorous study designs, and incorporate longitudinal and qualitative approaches to gain deeper insights and inform targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.