ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Machine Learning and SHAP Feature Analysis: Classification Model for Aroma Components in Green Plum Wine.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An Intelligent Identification Method for the Processing Degree of Stir-FriedFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study systematically investigated differences in volatile flavor profiles among fermented green plum wines by integrating gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), sensory evaluation, and odor activity value (OAV) analysis with machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) based feature interpretation. The primary objective was to evaluate the applicability of machine learning algorithms for flavor profiling of green plum wine. The results indicated that floral and fruity aromas were predominant in samples NG9, YM7, and YM9. Most green plum wines contained high levels of esters, with ethyl benzoate (up to 4820.53 μg/L), ethyl octanoate (up to 2640.83 μg/L), and benzenecarbaldehyde (up to 3432.96 μg/L) being the major contributors. Among the six classification algorithms compared, fuzzy c-means clustering provided the most distinct clustering structure, identifying three distinct flavor categories. Six machine learning models were subsequently established, of which the decision tree (DT) model exhibited the highest performance, with an accuracy of 95.13%. SHAP analysis further revealed that ethyl octanoate, benzyl ethanoate, and 2-phenylethyl ethanoate exerted the greatest influence on model predictions. Overall, these findings highlight the effectiveness of machine learning as a robust tool for the classification and interpretation of flavor characteristics in fermented fruit wines, with broad applicability in flavor science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.