Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073212›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Jurisdictional Comparison in the Utilization and Valorization of Animal By-Products of Slaughterhouse-Origin: A Global Review.

Ifedayo E Bello, Tawanda Tayengwa, Julianne Roe, Jianping Wu, Olugbenga P Soladoye

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ifedayo E BelloAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research and Development Center, 6000 C and E Trail, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada.ORCID 0009-0005-5853-2119
Tawanda TayengwaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research and Development Center, 6000 C and E Trail, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada.
Julianne RoeDepartment of Agricultural, Foods & Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, North Campus, University of Alberta, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-5673-797X
Jianping WuDepartment of Agricultural, Foods & Nutritional Science, Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, North Campus, University of Alberta, 116 St & 85 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 2R3, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2574-5191
Olugbenga P SoladoyeAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe Research and Development Center, 6000 C and E Trail, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4446-2149

Funding

Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada J-003168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal by-products (ABPs), comprising both edible and inedible components, offer significant nutritional, economic, and environmental value. However, their utilization differs markedly across global jurisdictions due to cultural preferences, regulatory frameworks, and technological capacities, which collectively shape consumption patterns and determine integration into food systems or diversion to industrial applications. While consumer reliance on offal remains high in the Global South, driven by tradition, affordability, and nutritional needs, its acceptance in the Global North is markedly lower, often limited by cultural aversion and perceived risks. Drawing from published evidence and primary survey data, this review examines regional consumption trends, industrial utilization pathways, and emerging valorization opportunities for ABPs. Globally, industrial use of ABPs is increasingly shifting toward advanced bioprocessing, integration within circular bioeconomy models, and high-value applications in nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, and bio-industrial sectors. An online cross-sectional survey (

Indexed as

animal by-productscircular bioeconomyconsumer preferencesjurisdictional comparisonsustainabilityvalorization

Identifiers

PMID42073212
PMCPMC13114427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.