Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42073189›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Connecting Texture and Breakup in Water and Simulated Gastric Fluid with Different Food-like Tablets.

Jingying Cheng, Timothy Langrish

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jingying ChengDrying and Process Technology Research Group, School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-0764-3680
Timothy LangrishDrying and Process Technology Research Group, School of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9927-345X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three food-like tablet types, with Young's moduli similar to those of real foods, were prepared to investigate breakup during digestion using caffeine as a model solute. Texture was evaluated in situ during simulated digestion by measuring Young's moduli and fracturability at various time points, providing indicators of stiffness and toughness. Type 1 disintegrated immediately; Type 2 dissolved first, followed by breakup at (1.5 ± 0.2) min, and Type 3 underwent dissolution. Young's modulus decreased rapidly for Type 1 within a minute (from 1.00 to 0.38 MPa), while Type 2 exhibited a decrease at 1.5 min (0.94-0.58 MPa) before breakup. Type 3 resisted disintegration due to its higher modulus of elasticity. The time-dependent decrease in Young's modulus is consistent with previous studies, suggesting that soft materials are more readily broken down. In simulated gastric fluid (SGF), Type 2 displayed similar dissolution and breakup behaviour (1.8 ± 0.04) min, followed by structural stabilisation due to swelling, with a slight decrease in modulus and fracturability at breakup. The study introduces a novel method that combines time-resolved, in situ textural measurements with real-time visual observation under physiologically relevant pulsatile flow, using purpose-designed food-like model materials to support the prediction of food breakdown behaviour and the design of foods with controlled digestion.

Indexed as

apple pectinbreakupinterfacial shear stressin vitro dissolution breaker systemmicrocrystalline celluloseYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID42073189
PMCPMC13115385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.