ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Label Information About Fermentation Processing Affects Consumers' Sensory and Hedonic Judgements of Specialty Coffee.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Coffee label information impacts consumer choice by communicating key product attributes. This study investigated whether label information on fermentation-related post-harvest processing techniques influence specialty coffee consumers' expectations and perception of brewed coffee. A total of 180 specialty coffee consumers participated in a within-subject tasting experiment, evaluating the same coffee paired with three labels: no processing information, 'fermentation', and 'carbonic maceration'. Participants first rated their expectations of aroma, flavour, acidity, sweetness, and subsequently, their experience of those attributes on tasting the coffees, as well as rating their liking and purchase intent. Additionally, they also assessed the usual-to-exotic flavour expectation and perceived price of coffees processed with traditional and innovative post-harvest methods. Results showed that the coffee paired with the label 'fermentation' was expected to be the most acidic and the least liked, which was confirmed during tasting, whereas the label 'carbonic maceration' increased curiosity and perceived novelty towards the coffee without negatively affecting the sensory acceptance. Innovative fermentation-related terms were also perceived as more exotic and expensive compared to traditional methods. These findings demonstrate that descriptive post-harvest terms on coffee labels significantly influence consumer expectations, sensory perception, and perceived value. They also highlight the importance of carefully selecting labelling terms to balance consumer curiosity, sensory expectations, and product acceptance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.