ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Effect of Molecular Weight and Protein Content on the Air-Water Interfacial and Foaming Properties of Soybean Soluble Polysaccharides.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of Molecular Weight and Protein Content on the Air-Water Interfacial and Foaming Properties of Soybean Soluble Polysaccharides.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study systematically investigated the influence of molecular weight (MW) and protein content (PC) on the interfacial behavior and foaming properties of soluble soybean polysaccharide (SSPS), aiming to elucidate the structure-function relationship for the targeted design of SSPS-based foam stabilizers. The results demonstrated that the low-MW group, particularly the LH sample (low MW, high PC), exhibited the highest foam expansion (FE = 272.5%), attributed to its smallest particle size, lowest zeta potential, and minimal surface tension, which facilitated rapid adsorption at the interface. Interfacial rheology revealed that all SSPS samples formed an elastic-dominated interfacial film (G' > G″). The HM sample (high MW, moderate PC) showed the most rapid increase in G' and the highest mechanical strength, while the LH sample (low MW, high PC) exhibited the strongest elastic response within the low-MW group, which contributed to its relatively high foam stability (FS = 69.9%). The interfacial viscoelasticity and foaming performance of SSPS are synergistically governed by its MW and PC. Low MW facilitates rapid adsorption and superior foam expansion, while high PC enhances interfacial film elasticity. Moreover, the long-term stability of foam depends not only on reduced interfacial tension but more critically on the mechanical strength and viscoelasticity of the interfacial film. These findings provide a crucial theoretical basis for optimizing SSPS applications in aerated foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.