ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Publication Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Malocclusions in Mexican Children and Teenagers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the publication bias of the reported prevalence of malocclusions in Mexican children and adolescents.
backgroundPublication bias determination is crucial in a systematic review, helping to ensure the conclusions' validity and reliability. Nevertheless, without accurate knowledge of disease prevalence and patterns, the health system risks inefficiency, inequity, and failure to meet the population's needs. On the other hand, malocclusions can impair proper chewing efficiency, contributing to digestive alterations, and nutritional deficiencies among other functional, psychological, and social problems. The data of the prevalence of malocclusion is imperative to implement early interventions in health services that prevent more severe skeletal discrepancies and reduce the need for invasive treatments in adolescence or adulthood.
methodsStudies were collected from five databases, following the PRISMA and Cochrane guidelines for systematic reviews. Eligibility criteria were full-text research in which the prevalence of malocclusions was reported. The risk of bias (Hoy tool), publication bias (the Doi plot and the Luis Furuya-Kanamori (LFK) index), and quality assessments (GRADE tool) were performed. The data were combined using a random-effects meta-analysis.
resultsThe result of the meta-analysis suggests a high prevalence of malocclusions in mixed dentition was 50.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 38.9-61.5%). However, the studies showed a risk of bias and publication bias.
conclusionsIn Mexico, there is a high prevalence of malocclusions among children and adolescents. However, these results are not robust enough to draw solid conclusions, due to the low certainty of the evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.