ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Digital Pediatric Physiotherapy Framework (DPPF): A Systematic Review of Digital Health Integration in Pediatric Physiotherapy.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTechnology such as telerehabilitation, virtual reality, robotics, and wearable systems are reshaping pediatric physiotherapy. While evidence remains fragmented, there is little guidance on how these approaches can be integrated into coherent, family-centered care pathways.
objectiveTo develop the Digital Pediatric Physiotherapy Framework (DPPF) based on a systematic review of randomized evidence on digital interventions in pediatric physiotherapy.
methodsSeveral databases were searched for randomized trials published after 1 January 2020, including PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. The included studies assessed the results of physiotherapist-delivered or physiotherapist-supervised digital interventions in children and adolescents aged 18 and younger. Population, intervention, outcome, implementation, and safety data were extracted. Considering the substantial heterogeneity of the findings, they were synthesized narratively. Cochrane RoB 2 was used to assess risk of bias, and GRADE was used to evaluate certainty of evidence.
resultsTwenty-nine trials involving 1196 participants were included. Most studies examined virtual reality and gaming-based interventions, with fewer evaluating telerehabilitation/tele-exercise and robotic or wearable technologies. Digital interventions were most often directed at body-function and activity-level outcomes, while participation outcomes were less frequently studied. The strongest evidence supported short-term benefits in balance, gross motor function, upper-limb activity, pain, and selected fitness outcomes, particularly in children with cerebral palsy. Evidence for telerehabilitation and robotic or wearable approaches was more limited but generally promising. Implementation, equity, cost, and long-term outcomes were rarely reported. No eligible trial directly evaluated electronic patient-reported outcome measures, digital triage, or clinical decision support as stand-alone interventions.
conclusionsDigital interventions have the potential to strengthen pediatric physiotherapy, particularly for short-term motor and functional outcomes. The proposed DPPF provides an implementation-informed structure to guide future research, pathway design, and more purposeful integration of digital health into pediatric rehabilitation practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.