ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Silver Diamine Fluoride for Arresting Severe Early Childhood Caries: A Review of the Clinical Framework for Interim Stabilization, Exit Criteria, and Timely Definitive Care.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Equity or Two-Tier Care? Guardrails for Silver Diamine Fluoride and Delegated Early Childhood Caries Pathways.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early childhood caries (SECC) in children aged 3-4 years is a high-burden condition with consequences that extend beyond the dentition, including pain, infection, sleep disturbance, impaired nutrition, disrupted family functioning, and diminished quality of life. In contemporary pediatric practice, 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) and other minimally invasive approaches are widely used to stabilize disease while behavior matures, preventive strategies are intensified, or access to definitive care is secured. This perspective argues that SDF should be conceptualized not as a standalone solution, but as an evidence-supported interim stabilization strategy embedded within a defined, goal-directed care pathway. Its use is most appropriate when framed as a means of buying time under clear clinical intent, particularly in cases where teeth are expected to remain functional for years, symptoms are present, structural integrity is compromised, or follow up is uncertain. Although clinical guidelines and systematic reviews support SDF for arresting cavitated lesions in primary teeth, current evidence does not support its use as a universal long-term treatment for severe disease. Real-world data suggest that many SDF-treated teeth require additional intervention within approximately 2 years, and that delays to definitive care-including treatment under sedation or general anesthesia when indicated-are often relatively short. In response, this paper proposes a practical bridge-to-destination framework grounded in three principles: explicit treatment intent, child-centered outcomes, and predefined exit criteria to ensure a timely transition to definitive dental care. Rather than discouraging SDF use, this approach seeks to optimize its role within a continuum of dental care, emphasizing proportionality, transparency, and durable outcomes for children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.