ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Mapping Research on Virtual Reality for Balance, Coordination, and Motor Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis with Topic Modeling.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thematic Structure of Clinical Rehabilitation Research in the Early Post-Pandemic Period: An LDA-Based Analysis of Publications from 2022 to 2025.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the Addition of a Cross-Education, Mirror Therapy, and Virtual Reality Exercises in Patients with Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: The CROSSMIRV Trial Protocol.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virtual reality (VR) has been increasingly adopted as a digital tool in rehabilitation for balance training, coordination improvement, and motor recovery, yet the literature remains dispersed across clinical rehabilitation, exercise-based interventions, and broader motor-related applications. This fragmentation makes it difficult to determine how the field has evolved and where research emphasis has shifted. This study mapped the research landscape and thematic evolution of VR for balance, coordination, and motor rehabilitation using bibliometric analysis and topic modeling. A total of 1258 articles indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection from 2011 to 2025 were analyzed. Only English language articles and reviews relevant to VR-based balance, coordination, or motor rehabilitation research were included, yielding a final dataset of 1258 publications. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used to examine keyword co-occurrence, clustering patterns, and temporal trends, while Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) was applied to identify latent themes and their temporal dynamics. The field has moved beyond early feasibility testing toward a more differentiated landscape shaped by distinct clinical targets, population groups, and training purposes. Seven recurring themes were identified, including vestibular rehabilitation and immersive training, post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation, efficacy and adverse-effect assessment, balance and gait training interventions, evidence synthesis and review-based evaluation, elderly exercise and cognitive interventions, and skill-oriented virtual task training with recent expansion toward broader population groups and task-specific applications beyond traditional rehabilitation settings. VR research on balance, coordination, and motor rehabilitation has evolved into a more thematically differentiated field rather than remaining a single rehabilitation-oriented domain. By combining bibliometric mapping with topic modeling, this study clarifies where evidence is concentrated and which thematic directions are gaining visibility, providing a clearer basis for future evidence synthesis and more comparable intervention reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.