ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Person-Centered Care in Digital Health Interventions for Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Double-Edged Nature of Patient-to-Patient Interactions in Digital Healthcare Communities: A Qualitative Study of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesDigital health interventions are increasingly used to support person-centered care (PCC) in chronic disease management, yet it remains unclear which PCC components are most consistently enabled by digital tools and how these relate to outcomes. This study synthesized evidence on digitally supported PCC for adults with chronic conditions, examining how interventions operationalize PCC and which clinical, patient-reported, and implementation outcomes are reported.
methodsA structured literature synthesis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across a heterogeneous evidence base, including randomized and pragmatic trials, observational studies, qualitative studies, and systematic reviews. The review protocol was pre-registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) Registries.
resultsAcross 16 included studies, digital solutions most consistently supported PCC through enhanced situational awareness via self-monitoring, strengthened partnership through two-way communication and coaching, and reinforced shared documentation through co-created health plans. Benefits were reported most consistently for process and experience outcomes, such as perceived access to support, engagement, and empowerment. Evidence for sustained long-term clinical improvements, such as glycemic control, was mixed and frequently limited by short follow-up periods and variation in intervention integration.
conclusionsDigitalization can strengthen PCC when embedded within relational care models and organizational workflows that translate patient-generated data into meaningful action. Future work should utilize clearer PCC operationalization, longer follow-up, and routine reporting of equity outcomes, alongside targeted training for healthcare professionals delivering PCC in digital encounters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.