ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond Principles: A Reflective-Cognitive Framework for Ethical Decision-Making in Anorexia Nervosa.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anorexia nervosa is a clinically complex and ethically challenging psychiatric disorder. Clinicians are frequently confronted with ethical dilemmas arising from conflicts between core ethical principles in everyday clinical practice. Professional codes of ethics and legal frameworks often fail to provide a stable basis for resolving these dilemmas due to the fluctuating medical risk and the ego-syntonic nature of anorexia nervosa. Under conditions of heightened responsibility and medical risk, clinicians' cognitive and emotional responses may be activated and may mediate ethical decision-making. Although such internal processes have been described in the literature, limited attention has been paid to their role in shaping ethical judgment in routine clinical care. The aim of this article is to conceptualize the decision-making processes that unfold in response to ethical dilemmas in the clinical context of anorexia nervosa and propose a sequential multi-level framework. A focused conceptual literature review was conducted to develop a reflective framework for clinical practice, drawing on selected studies in clinical ethics, healthcare law, anorexia nervosa care, and cognitive theory. Clinicians' internal cognitive and emotional processes play a significant role in ethical decision-making in complex clinical contexts such as anorexia nervosa and should be explicitly recognized and brought into reflective awareness through supervision and reflective practice. Ethical decision-making is therefore conceptualized as a dynamic process linking clinical events, clinicians' internal responses, ethical and legal considerations, and reflective clinical judgment. Incorporating structured reflection into clinical, educational, and supervisory settings may support more ethically informed and context-sensitive clinical judgment within multidisciplinary eating disorder services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.