ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Staff Attitudes Toward Healthcare Waste Separation: An Exploratory Survey from a Triple-Bottom-Line Perspective.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2022, the German healthcare system generated 400,000 tons of waste. Reducing this number could lower greenhouse gas emissions. The waste management plan at the University Medical Center Regensburg, and those of other comparable German facilities, require that glass, cardboard/paper, residual waste, and other non-hazardous materials are collected separately.
objectivesTo assess the personal interest, proficiency, opinion, and awareness of waste management among German dermatology staff to develop customized, resource-saving process optimization and training programs.
methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was conducted among German dermatology healthcare professionals between 27 February and 4 October 2024. Out of the 100 responses, 84 were complete and subsequently analyzed. Respondents included staff at dermatology wards, outpatient units, and private practices. Data were analyzed descriptively; comparisons were made between clinics and outpatient units, and correlations were identified among the items.
resultsMost respondents perceived the amount of waste generated during wound dressing changes as high; more than 60% expressed an interest in receiving further training on sustainability and waste reduction. Although many respondents reported having a good understanding of waste separation, they identified time pressure and stress as the two main obstacles to consistent implementation. Higher self-reported knowledge did not correspond with greater confidence in recycling as an effective waste reduction measure.
conclusionsThe findings suggest a discrepancy between awareness and practice regarding sustainable waste management in dermatology. Combining structural and organizational measures with targeted training and workflow optimization could promote more sustainable clinical practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.