Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42072870›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Monitoring the Depth of Sedation During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations.

Sonia Elena Popovici, Bogdan Miutescu, Stelian Adrian Ritiu, Tudor Voicu Moga, Ioan Sporea, Dorel Sandesc, Ovidiu Bedreag, Marius Păpurică, Mădălina Butaș, Alina Popescu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sonia Elena PopoviciFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0001-5195-3993
Bogdan MiutescuFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-5336-5789
Stelian Adrian RitiuFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8751-6813
Tudor Voicu MogaFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-8978-1856
Ioan SporeaAdvanced Regional Research Center in Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department VII: Internal Medicine II, Discipline of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-1510-9223
Dorel SandescFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Ovidiu BedreagFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-3432-9168
Marius PăpuricăFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-4065-3650
Mădălina ButașFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.
Alina PopescuFaculty of Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timișoara, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-7228

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sedation and anesthesia are integral components of modern gastrointestinal endoscopy, enhancing patient comfort and procedural success while adding risks such as respiratory and cardiovascular complications. Accurate monitoring of sedation depth is essential to balance safety and procedural efficacy. This narrative literature review synthesizes current evidence on monitoring depth of anesthesia during endoscopic procedures, including clinical assessment scales, capnography, and processed electroencephalogram (pEEG)-based technologies. The effects of commonly used sedative agents on monitoring parameters and the impact of different monitoring strategies on clinical outcomes are also discussed. Current evidence indicates that clinical assessment remains the cornerstone of monitoring during moderate sedation, while capnography improves early detection of respiratory compromise during deep sedation. pEEG-based monitoring may provide additional value in selected high-risk or prolonged procedures but should complement, not replace, clinical evaluation. A multimodal monitoring approach tailored to sedation depth and patient risk profile is likely to be the most effective strategy for optimizing patient safety. Future research should focus on standardizing monitoring protocols and identifying populations most likely to benefit from advanced monitoring techniques.

Indexed as

bispectral indexcapnographydepth of sedationendoscopic proceduresgastrointestinal endoscopymultimodal monitoringpatient safetyprocedural sedationprocessed electroencephalogramsedation monitoring

Identifiers

PMID42072870
PMCPMC13115536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.